Rue Pavée
Renovation project for a complex of historic buildings
A quiet façade
A narrow passageway in the Marais connecting Rue des Francs-Bourgeois to Rue des Rosiers, Rue Pavée is part of the dense, stony landscape of old Paris, where the depth of history often remains invisible from public spaces. Long characterised by deep lots organised around courtyards and gardens, the street still retains today the narrow, almost vertical scale inherited from its medieval fabric.
The site is situated within an area shaped by the successive transformations of the Marais: a former aristocratic neighbourhood that gradually became an artisan district, then a working-class neighbourhood, and finally a heritage district.
Across from the site stands the synagogue on Rue Pavée, built in 1913 by Hector Guimard for the Ashkenazi Orthodox Jewish community that had migrated from Eastern Europe in the early 20th century. Built on an extremely narrow lot — barely twelve metres wide — the synagogue features a vertical, undulating façade that already reflects the unique spatial conditions of the depths of the Marais: density, cramped quarters, and overlapping uses.
Site History
The site bears traces of the former Hôtel de Lorraine, which was gradually divided up and then transformed into a succession of private mansions — the Hôtel de Savoisy, the Hôtel Desmarets, and finally the Hôtel d’Herbouville. Certain ancient structural elements remain visible in the existing buildings: medieval cellars, thick walls, roof trusses, irregular floor plans, and painted decorations silently span the various periods of construction.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the buildings underwent extensive renovations. No. 13 was rebuilt in 1737 by Jean Hardouin-Mansart de Jouy and later transformed by Jacques Gondouin a few decades later. No. 11, meanwhile, retains a significant portion of the structures from the former Hôtel Desmarets. But the site was never static.
Beginning in the 19th century, the inner blocks gradually became more densely built-up: workshops, glass-roofed structures, storage sheds, and utility buildings filled the open spaces.
The arrival of the Darrasse factories in 1891 introduced a new industrial layer consisting of metal structures and brick-and-iron buildings that were built up against the historic mansions.
The site thus appears less as an isolated monument than as a condensed fragment of the history of the Marais itself: a complex where traces of the aristocratic palace, the industrial workshop, the administrative building, and the dense fabric of Parisian inner courtyards still coexist.
Transformation
Rue Pavée is the result of several centuries of successive adaptations. The townhouses there do not appear as intact structures, but as buildings that have already been transformed, expanded, divided, and reoccupied. Added to their original masonry are secondary buildings, new layouts, workshops, glass roofs, technical extensions, and, later, metal structures associated with industrial activities. The site therefore does not present itself as an original state to be restored, but as a history shaped by revisions, shifts, and reinterpretations.
This premise forms the basis of the project’s approach. The goal is not to recreate a lost historical image, nor to reduce the whole to an artificial stylistic unity, but to understand how this fragment of the Marais has taken shape over time. Here, heritage is not viewed as a static entity whose appearance must be preserved, but as a living structure capable of continuing to organize uses, circulation patterns, views, and relationships between spaces.
Rue Pavée follows this logic. The project does not focus solely on private mansions; it explores the entire network of relationships that have developed between porches, courtyards, industrial buildings, basements, and the depths of the city block. Some structures are removed when they block light, obstruct pathways, or hinder an understanding of the site. Others are preserved, not out of nostalgia, but because they bear witness to a crucial stage in the site’s evolution.
The value of the site thus lies less in the supposed purity of each of its parts than in the intelligence with which they are assembled.
The site has successively served aristocratic, residential, artisanal, industrial, administrative, and contemporary functions. The project does not seek to designate any one of these periods as more authentic than the others. On the contrary, it recognizes that each has contributed to shaping the physical reality of the place. The reinterpreted facade of the former industrial building, the reorganized circulation routes, the reopened courtyards, and the new access points to the basements do not, therefore, stand in opposition to what already exists; rather, they add another layer to a history already marked by additions and adaptations.
In this context, “transforming” does not mean “replacing.” It means keeping alive a whole that has never stopped evolving. Preserving Rue Pavée does not mean freezing its forms in time, but rather extending their capacity to accommodate new uses without erasing the traces of what came before. From this perspective, transformation is not the opposite of preservation; it becomes one of its prerequisites.
One of the project’s main challenges is to restore light, through-views, and continuity of circulation within a complex that has become progressively denser over the centuries.
Circulation routes have been reorganized, and differences in levels are used as spatial resources rather than constraints. The new courtyard facades extend this approach: their light, repetitive design functions less as a standalone element and more as a mechanism capable of diffusing light and depth throughout the block.
The project prioritizes conditions for daily use—ventilation, natural light, views, passageways, and connections between communal and more domestic spaces—achieved primarily through the organization of spatial relationships rather than the creation of a standalone visual statement.
Mixed-Use Program
The project brings together programs with vastly different timeframes and uses: offices, retail spaces, a spa, event spaces, family housing, and a residence for young workers coexist within a single spatial system.
Rather than compartmentalizing these functions, the project organizes their relationships. Communal spaces extend circulation routes, courtyards become shared interfaces, and differences in programmatic status create a diversity of atmospheres and activities.
The young workers’ residence occupies a special place within this organization. Located deep within the site, it reintroduces a residential and social dimension to a complex long characterized by administrative or industrial uses. Its location extends a historical characteristic of the Marais itself: the enduring coexistence of different activities, populations, and timeframes within the same dense fabric.
The building thus functions less as a juxtaposition of autonomous entities than as an interior micro-city organized around thresholds, passageways, and varying degrees of privacy.
The courtyard
In the Marais, deep lots organized around a street, courtyard, and garden constitute one of the historic structures of the Parisian urban fabric. Behind the narrow and relatively quiet street facades, interior spaces often unfold that are invisible from the public realm: a succession of thresholds, interlocking courtyards, outbuildings, workshops, and extensions accumulated over time.
Rue Pavée extends this historical logic. Just two porches—inherited from the former mansions—connect the street to a large central courtyard. The project therefore does not create a new, autonomous space; rather, it reactivates an organization already present in the site’s architectural history: that of a courtyard hidden behind the dense built-up frontage of the street.
Today, this courtyard serves as the project’s main breathing space. It brings together two architectural styles from different eras. On one side, the restored facades of the former mansions retain the solid, stone-like quality and the regularity of the Marais’s aristocratic fabric. On the other, the facade of the former industrial building has been completely renovated and redesigned based on the grid of the original facade. Its repetitive structure, verticality, and transparency bring light and depth back into the interior of the block.
The project does not seek to pit these two elements against each other but rather to facilitate their coexistence. The industrial façade does not function as a standalone contemporary object; it extends the site’s industrial history while introducing new conditions of use, light, and interaction with the courtyard. This continuity between industrial structure and contemporary transformation is part of a broader history of architectural conversions, in which each era adds a new layer rather than erasing the previous ones.
In the center of the courtyard stands a small, freestanding pavilion—a former outbuilding that now serves as an entrance to the basement spaces. Its presence preserves the fragmented memory of the old courtyard structures characteristic of the inner blocks of Paris. It functions less as an isolated object than as an additional element in this accumulation of structures, time periods, and circulation patterns.
The courtyard thus becomes a space for connection rather than a mere central void. It organizes views, passageways, differences in scale, and transitions between program areas. Here, the project reveals a historical quality of the Marais that is rarely visible from the street: behind the narrow fabric of Paris lies a dense, layered inner city, shaped by several centuries of successive transformations.
